How the FOI (Amendment) Bill slipped through
Thursday, 25 January 2007, 10:09
The Guardian’s David Hencke today looks at how the Freedom of Information (Amendment) Bill slipped through its second reading unopposed in the House of Commons:
On the day Westminster was convulsed by the revelations surrounding the dawn arrest of Ruth Turner, the senior Downing Street aide, in the cash-for-honours investigation, MPs approved on the nod the second reading of a bill to exclude parliament from the Freedom of Information Act.
…
David Maclean, the former Tory chief whip, introduced the measure in a private member’s bill. …
He acknowledged the effect of the bill would be to exempt parliament from the act at a time when the parliamentary authorities have lost a case at an information tribunal after trying to block more detailed disclosure of MPs’ expenses.When it was put to him that he had chosen the very end of a busy parliamentary day to get a second reading, he said: “I am showing some of the younger hands how you can get a bill through parliament after long experience as a whip in both getting and blocking bills through parliament.”
Hencke’s report also notes that because it is a private member’s bill, Maclean will be allowed to chose the members of the committee that scrutinises his bill. There are also the first hints of opposition, from Lib Dem MP Norman Baker, who recently won a Information Tribunal case against the House of Commons in order to force the release of MPs’ expenses.
Entry Filed under: Freedom of Information,Guardian,Information Tribunal,Journalism,Miscellanea,Parliament
Additional comments powered by BackType











3 Comments Add some more of your own
1. Ed | 25 January 2007 at 1410
This is sheer idiocy and poor journalism. For anyone to claim the bill was sneaked through at the “very end of a busy parliamentary day” is pathetic – it was a Friday afternoon… it can’t get any quieter in Parliament.
Then you have Norman Baker complaining. All he needed to do was shout “Object” and the Bill would have been denied a second reading without debate and would go to the back of the queue again. Surely one MP, good and true, could have been there to do the honours?
Personally, I don’t think this will go anywhere. Now that some noise has been generated, there will be the necessary opposition at report stage to kill the bill.
2. Martin | 25 January 2007 at 1416
I hope you’re right, Ed.
3. Tom | 31 January 2007 at 1731
Well, I live in David Cameron’s constituency, and I’m going to be complaining to him about this.
Tom
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed