<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Martin Stabe &#187; unbundling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.martinstabe.com/unbundling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.martinstabe.com</link>
	<description>A UK-centric look at new media and online journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 10:32:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Steve Rubel: As Curators Proliferate, Media Brands Face Loyalty Crisis</title>
		<link>http://www.steverubel.com/as-screens-and-curators-proliferate-media-bra</link>
		<comments>http://www.steverubel.com/as-screens-and-curators-proliferate-media-bra#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 11:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[aggregators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[curation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feedly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flipboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instapaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news360]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pulse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialreaders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unbundling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zite]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;Suddenly media brands are facing increased competition from an array of upstart curators that are growing in popularity. These services, which include Flipboard, Feedly, Zite, Pulse and News360 - a Russian app that&#039;s my personal favorite, pi... <a href="http://www.steverubel.com/as-screens-and-curators-proliferate-media-bra">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&quot;Suddenly media brands are facing increased competition from an array of upstart curators that are growing in popularity. These services, which include Flipboard, Feedly, Zite, Pulse and News360 - a Russian app that&#039;s my personal favorite, pictured above on the Blackberry Playbook (client) - curate and organize news from hundreds of sources often by topic into rich displays that are available on virtually every mobile platform. Some of these tap into your personal social network to make the experience even more personal. All make it easy to share.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2011/05/10/steve-rubel-as-curators-proliferate-media-brands-face-loyalty-crisis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mail Online: Google called &#8216;deeply unethical and tax avoiding&#8217; by ex C4 boss</title>
		<link>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1345441/Google-called-deeply-unethical-tax-avoiding-ex-C4-boss.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1345441/Google-called-deeply-unethical-tax-avoiding-ex-C4-boss.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 10:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parasite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unbundling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Luke Johnson: &#34;Effectively, Google invests negligible amounts in Britain, pays negligible amounts of tax on its underlying surplus to contribute to civil society, and yet extracts vast sums in advertising revenues. The tragedy is that those advert... <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1345441/Google-called-deeply-unethical-tax-avoiding-ex-C4-boss.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Luke Johnson: &quot;Effectively, Google invests negligible amounts in Britain, pays negligible amounts of tax on its underlying surplus to contribute to civil society, and yet extracts vast sums in advertising revenues. The tragedy is that those advertising revenues siphoned off to California should be<br />
used to help fund high-quality content – TV programmes, radio shows, newspaper and magazine articles.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2011/01/11/mail-online-google-called-deeply-unethical-and-tax-avoiding-by-ex-c4-boss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Australian: We didn&#8217;t kill newspapers, says Google</title>
		<link>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/news/we-didnt-kill-newspapers-says-google/story-e6frg90o-1225982291673</link>
		<comments>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/news/we-didnt-kill-newspapers-says-google/story-e6frg90o-1225982291673#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 15:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cuttings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[googlenews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unbundling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Times interview with Google News creator Krishna Bharat. On unbundling, he says: &#34;Classifieds vanished long before we existed .. We didn&#039;t cause this. The fact is news is online for free, monetised by ads.&#34; <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/news/we-didnt-kill-newspapers-says-google/story-e6frg90o-1225982291673">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Times interview with Google News creator Krishna Bharat. On unbundling, he says: &quot;Classifieds vanished long before we existed .. We didn&#039;t cause this. The fact is news is online for free, monetised by ads.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2011/01/06/the-australian-we-didnt-kill-newspapers-says-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>George Brock Blog: Taking a (little) brick out of the paywall</title>
		<link>http://georgebrock.net/taking-a-little-brick-out-of-the-paywall/</link>
		<comments>http://georgebrock.net/taking-a-little-brick-out-of-the-paywall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unbundling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[George Brock: &#34;The Times ... now operates what I call an &#39;extreme paywall&#39;: the charge applies to everything except the front page. Behind the barrier sit millions of fragments of information, ranging from the important to the specialist to the insignificant. ... A system that locks in so many items of such different value ... without being able to distinguish between them can’t work in the long run.&#34; <a href="http://georgebrock.net/taking-a-little-brick-out-of-the-paywall/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[George Brock: &quot;The Times ... now operates what I call an &#039;extreme paywall&#039;: the charge applies to everything except the front page. Behind the barrier sit millions of fragments of information, ranging from the important to the specialist to the insignificant. ... A system that locks in so many items of such different value ... without being able to distinguish between them can’t work in the long run.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2010/07/19/george-brock-blog-taking-a-little-brick-out-of-the-paywall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A VC: I Prefer Safari to Content Apps On The iPad</title>
		<link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2010/05/i-prefer-safari-to-content-apps-on-the-ipad.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2010/05/i-prefer-safari-to-content-apps-on-the-ipad.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 10:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unbundling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fred Wilson: &#34;I&#39;ve tried a few content apps on the iPad, including the much discussed Wired app. But I don&#39;t like reading content via apps on the iPad and I gravitate to the Safari browser.&#34; <a href="http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2010/05/i-prefer-safari-to-content-apps-on-the-ipad.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Fred Wilson: &quot;I&#039;ve tried a few content apps on the iPad, including the much discussed Wired app. But I don&#039;t like reading content via apps on the iPad and I gravitate to the Safari browser.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2010/06/01/a-vc-i-prefer-safari-to-content-apps-on-the-ipad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Techcrunch: Stanford Graduates Release Pulse, A Must-Have News App For The iPad</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/31/pulse-ipad/</link>
		<comments>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/31/pulse-ipad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 08:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unbundling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;The application, called Pulse, is essentially a visually attractive RSS-based news aggregator. On sale for $3.99 ... the app is aimed to please both hardcore RSS reader users and people who are willing to pay top dollars for single publication apps.&#34; <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/31/pulse-ipad/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&quot;The application, called Pulse, is essentially a visually attractive RSS-based news aggregator. On sale for $3.99 ... the app is aimed to please both hardcore RSS reader users and people who are willing to pay top dollars for single publication apps.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2010/06/01/techcrunch-stanford-graduates-release-pulse-a-must-have-news-app-for-the-ipad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Observer: Rupert Murdoch&#8217;s paywall at the Times may not be a disaster</title>
		<link>http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/may/30/rupert-murdoch-times-paywall</link>
		<comments>http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/may/30/rupert-murdoch-times-paywall#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 15:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunday_times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unbundling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Preston thinks the Times is trying to put the unbundling genie back in the bottle: &#34;So, once I&#39;ve stumped up cash for access, I don&#39;t necessarily look at paywalled paper newspaper sites in the same old digital way. I may read them as I would a print newspaper. I&#39;m not clicking around, adding page view to page view, following a tale that interests me from site to site. Consistency counts. My habits have changed because I&#39;ve paid good money. The stuff behind the wall looks like a newspaper and basically exists to be read as an electronic newspaper. There&#39;s a certain logic here.&#34; <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/may/30/rupert-murdoch-times-paywall">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Peter Preston thinks the Times is trying to put the unbundling genie back in the bottle: &quot;So, once I&#039;ve stumped up cash for access, I don&#039;t necessarily look at paywalled paper newspaper sites in the same old digital way. I may read them as I would a print newspaper. I&#039;m not clicking around, adding page view to page view, following a tale that interests me from site to site. Consistency counts. My habits have changed because I&#039;ve paid good money. The stuff behind the wall looks like a newspaper and basically exists to be read as an electronic newspaper. There&#039;s a certain logic here.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2010/05/30/observer-rupert-murdochs-paywall-at-the-times-may-not-be-a-disaster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Atlantic: How to Save the News</title>
		<link>http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/04/how-to-save-the-news/8095/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/04/how-to-save-the-news/8095/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 08:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Essential Reading for Online Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fastflip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[googlenews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[livingstories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unbundling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James Fallows: &#34;after talking during the past year with engineers and strategists at Google and recently interviewing some of their counterparts inside the news industry, I am convinced that there is a larger vision for news coming out of Google; that it is not simply a charity effort to buy off critics; and that it has been pushed hard enough by people at the top of the company, especially Schmidt, to become an internalized part of the culture in what is arguably the world’s most important media organization.&#34; <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/04/how-to-save-the-news/8095/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[James Fallows: &quot;after talking during the past year with engineers and strategists at Google and recently interviewing some of their counterparts inside the news industry, I am convinced that there is a larger vision for news coming out of Google; that it is not simply a charity effort to buy off critics; and that it has been pushed hard enough by people at the top of the company, especially Schmidt, to become an internalized part of the culture in what is arguably the world’s most important media organization.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2010/05/11/the-atlantic-how-to-save-the-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The State of the News Media 2010: Audience Behavior</title>
		<link>http://www.stateofthemedia.org/2010/online_audience.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.stateofthemedia.org/2010/online_audience.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 06:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promiscuity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unbundling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;[For] this year’s State of the News Media Report. First we surveyed 2,259 American adults on landlines and cell phones about their news consumption habits ... Only 21% say they tend to rely primarily on one destination; only a third even say they have a favorite news website. But these online news grazers do not range far. Most (57%) rely mostly on two-to-five websites. Only 12% use more than six.&#34; <a href="http://www.stateofthemedia.org/2010/online_audience.php">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&quot;[For] this year’s State of the News Media Report. First we surveyed 2,259 American adults on landlines and cell phones about their news consumption habits ... Only 21% say they tend to rely primarily on one destination; only a third even say they have a favorite news website. But these online news grazers do not range far. Most (57%) rely mostly on two-to-five websites. Only 12% use more than six.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2010/03/15/the-state-of-the-news-media-2010-audience-behavior/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York Times: Online News Readers Use 5 Sites or Fewer, Study Says</title>
		<link>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/15/business/media/15pew.html?src=twt&#038;twt=nytimesbusiness</link>
		<comments>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/15/business/media/15pew.html?src=twt&#038;twt=nytimesbusiness#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 06:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promiscuity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unbundling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;Only 35 percent of the people who go online for news have a favorite site, and just 21 percent are more or less &#39;monogamous,&#39; relying primarily on a single Internet news source, according to a survey by the Pew Research Center, in a report to be released Monday by Pew’s Project for Excellence in Journalism. But 57 percent of that audience relies on just two to five sites&#34; <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/15/business/media/15pew.html?src=twt&#038;twt=nytimesbusiness">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&quot;Only 35 percent of the people who go online for news have a favorite site, and just 21 percent are more or less &#039;monogamous,&#039; relying primarily on a single Internet news source, according to a survey by the Pew Research Center, in a report to be released Monday by Pew’s Project for Excellence in Journalism. But 57 percent of that audience relies on just two to five sites&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2010/03/15/new-york-times-online-news-readers-use-5-sites-or-fewer-study-says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Public Policy Blog: Newspaper economics: online and offline</title>
		<link>http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2010/03/newspaper-economics-online-and-offline.html</link>
		<comments>http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2010/03/newspaper-economics-online-and-offline.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unbundling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google chief economist Hal Varian: &#34;[The] real money in search engine advertising is in the highly commercial verticals like Shopping, Health, and Travel. Unfortunately, most of the search clicks that go to newspapers are in categories like Sports, News &#38; Current Events, and Local, which don’t attract the biggest spending advertisers. ... This isn&#39;t so surprising: the fact of the matter is that newspapers have never made much money from news. They’ve made money from the special interest sections on topics such as Automotive, Travel, Home &#38; Garden, Food &#38; Drink, and so on. These sections attract contextually targeted advertising, which is much more effective than non-targeted advertising. ... Traditionally, the ad revenue from these special sections has been used to cross-subsidize the core news production.&#34; <a href="http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2010/03/newspaper-economics-online-and-offline.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Google chief economist Hal Varian: &quot;[The] real money in search engine advertising is in the highly commercial verticals like Shopping, Health, and Travel. Unfortunately, most of the search clicks that go to newspapers are in categories like Sports, News &amp; Current Events, and Local, which don’t attract the biggest spending advertisers. ... This isn&#039;t so surprising: the fact of the matter is that newspapers have never made much money from news. They’ve made money from the special interest sections on topics such as Automotive, Travel, Home &amp; Garden, Food &amp; Drink, and so on. These sections attract contextually targeted advertising, which is much more effective than non-targeted advertising. ... Traditionally, the ad revenue from these special sections has been used to cross-subsidize the core news production.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2010/03/10/google-public-policy-blog-newspaper-economics-online-and-offline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chris Dixon: News is a lousy business for Google too</title>
		<link>http://cdixon.org/2010/03/07/news-is-a-lousy-business-for-google-too/</link>
		<comments>http://cdixon.org/2010/03/07/news-is-a-lousy-business-for-google-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[googlenews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unbundling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;... because their real business is selling ads on queries where the user likely has purchasing intent. Big money-making categories include travel, consumer electronics and malpractice lawyers. News queries are loss leaders.&#34; <a href="http://cdixon.org/2010/03/07/news-is-a-lousy-business-for-google-too/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&quot;... because their real business is selling ads on queries where the user likely has purchasing intent. Big money-making categories include travel, consumer electronics and malpractice lawyers. News queries are loss leaders.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2010/03/08/chris-dixon-news-is-a-lousy-business-for-google-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Journalism.co.uk Editors&#8217; Blog: How much is an article worth? ‘Dead tree’ thinking could hinder digital content economy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2010/02/10/how-much-is-an-article-worth/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2010/02/10/how-much-is-an-article-worth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Essential Reading for Online Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unbundling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patrick Smith on unnbundling, the ever-present elephant in the room during digital content discussions: &#34;But to reach a competitive pricepoint, [Rupert Murdoch] and other publishers will have to massively realign the value of each piece of news and comment from its current-day, paper value of one or two pence to fractions of pence.&#34; <a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2010/02/10/how-much-is-an-article-worth/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Patrick Smith on unnbundling, the ever-present elephant in the room during digital content discussions: &quot;But to reach a competitive pricepoint, [Rupert Murdoch] and other publishers will have to massively realign the value of each piece of news and comment from its current-day, paper value of one or two pence to fractions of pence.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2010/02/11/journalism-co-uk-editors-blog-how-much-is-an-article-worth-%e2%80%98dead-tree%e2%80%99-thinking-could-hinder-digital-content-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wired: Tablets of the new covenant</title>
		<link>http://www.wired.co.uk/wired-magazine/archive/2010/03/start/tablets-of-the-new-covenant.aspx?page=all</link>
		<comments>http://www.wired.co.uk/wired-magazine/archive/2010/03/start/tablets-of-the-new-covenant.aspx?page=all#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unbundling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some magazine publishers think tablets are going to create a more print-like, less unbundlied experience. This isn&#39;t going to work, is it? Peter Kirwan in Wired: &#34;Consumers reading tablets will experience something &#39;more immersive&#39;, akin to a print based newspaper or magazine. &#39;When I&#39;m sitting down to read a newspaper or a magazine,&#34; says [Ken Bronfin, president of interactive media at Hearst Corporation], &#39;I&#39;ll give it 30 or 45 minutes. I think I experience the medium and the advertising in a totally different way.&#34; <a href="http://www.wired.co.uk/wired-magazine/archive/2010/03/start/tablets-of-the-new-covenant.aspx?page=all">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Some magazine publishers think tablets are going to create a more print-like, less unbundlied experience. This isn&#039;t going to work, is it? Peter Kirwan in Wired: &quot;Consumers reading tablets will experience something &#039;more immersive&#039;, akin to a print based newspaper or magazine. &#039;When I&#039;m sitting down to read a newspaper or a magazine,&quot; says [Ken Bronfin, president of interactive media at Hearst Corporation], &#039;I&#039;ll give it 30 or 45 minutes. I think I experience the medium and the advertising in a totally different way.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2010/02/03/wired-tablets-of-the-new-covenant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wired.co.uk: Mobile news apps vs tweet-led link economy</title>
		<link>http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2010-02/01/mobile-news-apps-vs-tweet-led-link-economy.aspx?utm_source=twitterfeed&#038;utm_medium=twitter</link>
		<comments>http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2010-02/01/mobile-news-apps-vs-tweet-led-link-economy.aspx?utm_source=twitterfeed&#038;utm_medium=twitter#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 07:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unbundling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Kirwan: &#34;Promiscuity is limited by the opportunity for discovery. Searching for alternatives to stories that pop up inside your app will cost you time. And for most mobile users, that&#39;s a commodity in short supply. On this basis, it&#39;s a racing certainty that some news publishers perceive apps as a way of putting Humpty-Dumpty back together again, on the mobile web at least. ... Suddenly, our work-flavoured, ADD-like, promiscuity-fuelled browsing for atomised content on laptops seems like just one scenario among others.&#34; <a href="http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2010-02/01/mobile-news-apps-vs-tweet-led-link-economy.aspx?utm_source=twitterfeed&#038;utm_medium=twitter">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Peter Kirwan: &quot;Promiscuity is limited by the opportunity for discovery. Searching for alternatives to stories that pop up inside your app will cost you time. And for most mobile users, that&#039;s a commodity in short supply. On this basis, it&#039;s a racing certainty that some news publishers perceive apps as a way of putting Humpty-Dumpty back together again, on the mobile web at least. ... Suddenly, our work-flavoured, ADD-like, promiscuity-fuelled browsing for atomised content on laptops seems like just one scenario among others.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2010/02/02/wired-co-uk-mobile-news-apps-vs-tweet-led-link-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SteveOuting.com: Personalized news and why the iPad is no savior</title>
		<link>http://steveouting.com/2010/01/28/personalized-news-and-why-the-ipad-is-no-savior/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+steveouting+%28SteveOuting.com%29&#038;utm_content=Google+Reader</link>
		<comments>http://steveouting.com/2010/01/28/personalized-news-and-why-the-ipad-is-no-savior/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+steveouting+%28SteveOuting.com%29&#038;utm_content=Google+Reader#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unbundling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve Outing: &#34;[Am I] suddenly going to pay for news viewed on the iPad? Umm, not likely. Because my behavior as a news consumer has changed over the years. Like many Internet users, I view many news sources every day.  ... Why wouldn’t I want to pay to support journalism? … Simple: Because there’s too much to pay for! News brands cannot expect me, or most online news consumers who are not loyal to only one or two or three brands, to pay monthly or annual fees to each.: <a href="http://steveouting.com/2010/01/28/personalized-news-and-why-the-ipad-is-no-savior/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+steveouting+%28SteveOuting.com%29&#038;utm_content=Google+Reader">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Steve Outing: &quot;[Am I] suddenly going to pay for news viewed on the iPad? Umm, not likely. Because my behavior as a news consumer has changed over the years. Like many Internet users, I view many news sources every day.  ... Why wouldn’t I want to pay to support journalism? … Simple: Because there’s too much to pay for! News brands cannot expect me, or most online news consumers who are not loyal to only one or two or three brands, to pay monthly or annual fees to each.:]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2010/01/30/steveouting-com-personalized-news-and-why-the-ipad-is-no-savior/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steve Yelvington: Regarding the iPad, I am Dr. Buzzkill</title>
		<link>http://www.yelvington.com/content/regarding-ipad-i-am-dr-buzzkill</link>
		<comments>http://www.yelvington.com/content/regarding-ipad-i-am-dr-buzzkill#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unbundling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;It&#39;s certainly no savior for newspapers. What are you going to do, kill your website and sell your &#39;publication&#39; in the App Store? Nonsense. The iPad doesn&#39;t change the economic equation. You aren&#39;t prevented from selling your content by lack of technology and tools; you&#39;re prevented by a lack of market demand. And the demand isn&#39;t there because people have, at their fingertips, far more alternatives than the human brain can process -- literally billions. The iPad doesn&#39;t change that. If anything, it makes it worse by furthering mobile access to the Web.&#34; <a href="http://www.yelvington.com/content/regarding-ipad-i-am-dr-buzzkill">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&quot;It&#039;s certainly no savior for newspapers. What are you going to do, kill your website and sell your &#039;publication&#039; in the App Store? Nonsense. The iPad doesn&#039;t change the economic equation. You aren&#039;t prevented from selling your content by lack of technology and tools; you&#039;re prevented by a lack of market demand. And the demand isn&#039;t there because people have, at their fingertips, far more alternatives than the human brain can process -- literally billions. The iPad doesn&#039;t change that. If anything, it makes it worse by furthering mobile access to the Web.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2010/01/30/steve-yelvington-regarding-the-ipad-i-am-dr-buzzkill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Journalism.co.uk Editors&#8217; Blog: Why the iPad isn’t the saviour of journalism as we know it</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2010/01/27/why-the-itablet-isnt-the-saviour-of-journalism-as-we-know-it/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2010/01/27/why-the-itablet-isnt-the-saviour-of-journalism-as-we-know-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unbundling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patrick Smith: &#34;Apple’s new device is just another distribution platform for words, pictures, videos and data, just like PCs, mobiles and print. Recreating a print experience on another device is not going to solve the economic crisis news finds itself in: Google will still be more efficient at selling advertising and will still point readers to free content.&#34; <a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2010/01/27/why-the-itablet-isnt-the-saviour-of-journalism-as-we-know-it/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Patrick Smith: &quot;Apple’s new device is just another distribution platform for words, pictures, videos and data, just like PCs, mobiles and print. Recreating a print experience on another device is not going to solve the economic crisis news finds itself in: Google will still be more efficient at selling advertising and will still point readers to free content.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2010/01/30/journalism-co-uk-editors-blog-why-the-ipad-isn%e2%80%99t-the-saviour-of-journalism-as-we-know-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advertising Age: Google Exec Says Newspapers Need to Re-Think Their Models</title>
		<link>http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=141788</link>
		<comments>http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=141788#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unbundling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;only significant evolution will save [newspapers], Google&#39;s chief economist, Hal Varian, said in a talk with journalism students at UC Berkeley. ... &#39;The verticals that drive traffic are things like sports, weather and current news, but the money is in things like travel and shopping,&#34; says Mr. Varian. &#34;Pure news is the unique product that newspapers provide, but it is very hard to monetize.&#39;&#34; <a href="http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=141788">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&quot;only significant evolution will save [newspapers], Google&#039;s chief economist, Hal Varian, said in a talk with journalism students at UC Berkeley. ... &#039;The verticals that drive traffic are things like sports, weather and current news, but the money is in things like travel and shopping,&quot; says Mr. Varian. &quot;Pure news is the unique product that newspapers provide, but it is very hard to monetize.&#039;&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2010/01/30/advertising-age-google-exec-says-newspapers-need-to-re-think-their-models/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Economist: Newspapers online: The promiscuity problem</title>
		<link>http://www.economist.com/world/britain/displaystory.cfm?story_id=15017453</link>
		<comments>http://www.economist.com/world/britain/displaystory.cfm?story_id=15017453#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 23:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[aggregators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unbundling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;On December 1st Google offered to let publishers who want to charge for news restrict traffic to five articles per reader, per day. This week’s study [by Oliver &#38; Ohlbaum] suggests that the olive branch may be almost irrelevant. Readers do not need aggregators to point them to news sources, and they graze so widely that few would reach the five-article limit.&#34; <a href="http://www.economist.com/world/britain/displaystory.cfm?story_id=15017453">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&quot;On December 1st Google offered to let publishers who want to charge for news restrict traffic to five articles per reader, per day. This week’s study [by Oliver &amp; Ohlbaum] suggests that the olive branch may be almost irrelevant. Readers do not need aggregators to point them to news sources, and they graze so widely that few would reach the five-article limit.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2009/12/14/the-economist-newspapers-online-the-promiscuity-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

