<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Martin Stabe &#187; sources</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.martinstabe.com/sources/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.martinstabe.com</link>
	<description>A UK-centric look at new media and online journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 10:32:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New York Times: On Twitter, Conservative (or Liberal) by Association</title>
		<link>http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/21/on-twitter-conservative-by-association/</link>
		<comments>http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/21/on-twitter-conservative-by-association/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 14:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social network analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;Much of the discussion about over-sharing on social networks has focused on users not being able to escape from something they have said online. But a person’s connections are also revealing, as this research found.&#34; <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/21/on-twitter-conservative-by-association/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&quot;Much of the discussion about over-sharing on social networks has focused on users not being able to escape from something they have said online. But a person’s connections are also revealing, as this research found.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2011/03/22/new-york-times-on-twitter-conservative-or-liberal-by-association/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ben Goldacre: If you don&#8217;t link to primary sources, you are dead to me</title>
		<link>http://bengoldacre.posterous.com/if-you-dont-link-to-primary-sources-you-are-d</link>
		<comments>http://bengoldacre.posterous.com/if-you-dont-link-to-primary-sources-you-are-d#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 10:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre: &#34;If you don&#039;t link to primary sources, you are dead to me, I do not trust you. There is a high risk that you chose not to link it, because you&#039;re hiding something&#34; <a href="http://bengoldacre.posterous.com/if-you-dont-link-to-primary-sources-you-are-d">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre: &quot;If you don&#039;t link to primary sources, you are dead to me, I do not trust you. There is a high risk that you chose not to link it, because you&#039;re hiding something&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2011/03/22/ben-goldacre-if-you-dont-link-to-primary-sources-you-are-dead-to-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bad Science: Why don’t journalists link to primary sources?</title>
		<link>http://www.badscience.net/2011/03/why-dont-journalists-link-to-primary-sources/</link>
		<comments>http://www.badscience.net/2011/03/why-dont-journalists-link-to-primary-sources/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 10:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre: &#34;Why don’t journalists link to primary sources? Whether it’s a press release, an academic journal article, a formal report, or perhaps (if everyone’s feeling brave) the full transcript of an interview, the primary source contai... <a href="http://www.badscience.net/2011/03/why-dont-journalists-link-to-primary-sources/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ben Goldacre: &quot;Why don’t journalists link to primary sources? Whether it’s a press release, an academic journal article, a formal report, or perhaps (if everyone’s feeling brave) the full transcript of an interview, the primary source contains more information for interested readers, it shows your working, and it allows people to check whether what you wrote was true. Perhaps linking to primary sources would just be too embarrassing. ... It’s also an interesting difference between different forms of media: most bloggers have no institutional credibility, and so they must build it, by linking transparently, and allowing you to easily double check their work.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2011/03/22/bad-science-why-don%e2%80%99t-journalists-link-to-primary-sources/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York Times: What Would Ellsberg Do With Pentagon Papers Today?</title>
		<link>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/19/business/media/19link.html?partner=rss&#038;emc=rss</link>
		<comments>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/19/business/media/19link.html?partner=rss&#038;emc=rss#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;[If] someone today had the Pentagon Papers, or the modern equivalent, would he still go to the press, as Daniel Ellsberg did nearly 40 years ago and wait for the documents to be analyzed and published? Or would that person simply post them online immediately? [Daniel] Ellsberg knows his answer. &#39;As of today, I wouldn’t have waited that long,&#39; he said in an interview last week. &#39;I would have gotten a scanner and put them on the Internet.&#39;&#34; <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/19/business/media/19link.html?partner=rss&#038;emc=rss">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&quot;[If] someone today had the Pentagon Papers, or the modern equivalent, would he still go to the press, as Daniel Ellsberg did nearly 40 years ago and wait for the documents to be analyzed and published? Or would that person simply post them online immediately? [Daniel] Ellsberg knows his answer. &#039;As of today, I wouldn’t have waited that long,&#039; he said in an interview last week. &#039;I would have gotten a scanner and put them on the Internet.&#039;&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2010/04/19/new-york-times-what-would-ellsberg-do-with-pentagon-papers-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nieman Journalism Lab: Iceland aims to become an offshore haven for journalists and leakers</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/02/iceland-aims-to-become-an-offshore-haven-for-journalists-and-leakers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/02/iceland-aims-to-become-an-offshore-haven-for-journalists-and-leakers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[free-expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;On Tuesday, the Icelandic parliament is expected to introduce a measure aimed at making the country an international center for investigative journalism publishing, by passing the strongest combination of source protection, freedom of speech, and libel-tourism prevention laws in the world. ... Could global news organizations with a home office in Reykjavík soon be as common as Delaware corporations or Cayman Islands assets?&#34; <a href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/02/iceland-aims-to-become-an-offshore-haven-for-journalists-and-leakers/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&quot;On Tuesday, the Icelandic parliament is expected to introduce a measure aimed at making the country an international center for investigative journalism publishing, by passing the strongest combination of source protection, freedom of speech, and libel-tourism prevention laws in the world. ... Could global news organizations with a home office in Reykjavík soon be as common as Delaware corporations or Cayman Islands assets?&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2010/02/11/nieman-journalism-lab-iceland-aims-to-become-an-offshore-haven-for-journalists-and-leakers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube: Newswipe S02E02 at 5:09</title>
		<link>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjEeiPy2MAI#t=5m09s</link>
		<comments>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjEeiPy2MAI#t=5m09s#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[attribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Essential Reading for Online Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heather Brooke on Newswipe on attribution and sourcing and accountablity in British journalism. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjEeiPy2MAI#t=5m09s">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Heather Brooke on Newswipe on attribution and sourcing and accountablity in British journalism.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2010/01/30/youtube-newswipe-s02e02-at-509/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Right To Know: When Brooke met Brooker</title>
		<link>http://www.yrtk.org/2010/when-brooke-met-brooker/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yrtk.org/2010/when-brooke-met-brooker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Essential Reading for Online Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heather Brooke on Charlie Brooker&#39;s Newswipe: &#34;I’m talking here about the way journalists grant public officials anonymity for no good reason. By the very definition of their role, official spokespeople have absolutely no reason to be anonymous yet one of the more dubious practices of the British press is the way reporters collude with officials by granting anonymity.&#34; <a href="http://www.yrtk.org/2010/when-brooke-met-brooker/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Heather Brooke on Charlie Brooker&#039;s Newswipe: &quot;I’m talking here about the way journalists grant public officials anonymity for no good reason. By the very definition of their role, official spokespeople have absolutely no reason to be anonymous yet one of the more dubious practices of the British press is the way reporters collude with officials by granting anonymity.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2010/01/30/your-right-to-know-when-brooke-met-brooker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ComputerWorld: Wikileaks plans to make the Web a leakier place</title>
		<link>http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9139180/Wikileaks_plans_to_make_the_Web_a_leakier_place</link>
		<comments>http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9139180/Wikileaks_plans_to_make_the_Web_a_leakier_place#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 13:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wiki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikileaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[_t]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;Wikileaks ... is working on a plan to make the Web leakier by enabling newspapers, human rights organizations, criminal investigators and others to embed an &#39;upload a disclosure to me via Wikileaks&#39; form onto their Web sites.&#34; <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9139180/Wikileaks_plans_to_make_the_Web_a_leakier_place">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&quot;Wikileaks ... is working on a plan to make the Web leakier by enabling newspapers, human rights organizations, criminal investigators and others to embed an &#039;upload a disclosure to me via Wikileaks&#039; form onto their Web sites.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2009/10/09/computerworld-wikileaks-plans-to-make-the-web-a-leakier-place/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shane Richmond: Naming Nightjack: The Times was right legally but wrong morally</title>
		<link>http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/shane_richmond/blog/2009/06/17/naming_nightjack_the_times_was_right_legally_but_wrong_morally</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/shane_richmond/blog/2009/06/17/naming_nightjack_the_times_was_right_legally_but_wrong_morally#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nightjack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shane Richmond: &#34;I can see the sense in both The Times&#39;s argument and Mr Justice Eady&#39;s. The legal case is clear but I&#39;m less comfortable with the moral case. Nightjack was trying to shed light on his work and bring the public a view of policing that could only be done anonymously. Shouldn&#39;t newspapers be protecting people like him? Certainly, The Times would have protected him had he been their source. But being out on his own meant that he was fair game.&#34; <a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/shane_richmond/blog/2009/06/17/naming_nightjack_the_times_was_right_legally_but_wrong_morally">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Shane Richmond: &quot;I can see the sense in both The Times&#039;s argument and Mr Justice Eady&#039;s. The legal case is clear but I&#039;m less comfortable with the moral case. Nightjack was trying to shed light on his work and bring the public a view of policing that could only be done anonymously. Shouldn&#039;t newspapers be protecting people like him? Certainly, The Times would have protected him had he been their source. But being out on his own meant that he was fair game.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2009/06/19/shane-richmond-naming-nightjack-the-times-was-right-legally-but-wrong-morally/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Times Online: Nightjack: mixed feelings over his exposure</title>
		<link>http://timesonline.typepad.com/crime/2009/06/nightjack-mixed-feelings-over-his-exposure.html</link>
		<comments>http://timesonline.typepad.com/crime/2009/06/nightjack-mixed-feelings-over-his-exposure.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;We must confess to mixed feelings about the High Court ruling which allows the name of the award-winning blogger Nightjack to be published.&#34; (more unimpressed commenters) <a href="http://timesonline.typepad.com/crime/2009/06/nightjack-mixed-feelings-over-his-exposure.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&quot;We must confess to mixed feelings about the High Court ruling which allows the name of the award-winning blogger Nightjack to be published.&quot; (more unimpressed commenters)]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2009/06/19/times-online-nightjack-mixed-feelings-over-his-exposure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Media Guardian: MPs&#8217; expenses: how scoop came to light – and why journalists fear a &#8216;knock on the door&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/may/18/mps-expenses-how-scoop-came-light</link>
		<comments>http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/may/18/mps-expenses-how-scoop-came-light#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 18:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Telegraph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;The expenses data was sighted by at least three other newspapers before the Telegraph broke the story more than a week ago.&#34; <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/may/18/mps-expenses-how-scoop-came-light">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&quot;The expenses data was sighted by at least three other newspapers before the Telegraph broke the story more than a week ago.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2009/05/18/media-guardian-mps-expenses-how-scoop-came-to-light-%e2%80%93-and-why-journalists-fear-a-knock-on-the-door/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WSJ.com: Ex-Army Officer Helped Paper Get Sensitive Information</title>
		<link>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124241468014524689.html</link>
		<comments>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124241468014524689.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 13:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Telegraph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;In the hyper-competitive world of Fleet Street, it is a burning question: how did the Daily Telegraph newspaper obtain sensitive information on politicians&#39; expenses that have been secret for years.&#34; <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124241468014524689.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&quot;In the hyper-competitive world of Fleet Street, it is a burning question: how did the Daily Telegraph newspaper obtain sensitive information on politicians&#039; expenses that have been secret for years.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2009/05/17/wsjcom-ex-army-officer-helped-paper-get-sensitive-information/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Belfast Telegraph: Journalist refuses to hand over Real IRA information</title>
		<link>http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/journalist-refuses-to-hand-over-real-ira-information-14289991.html?r=RSS</link>
		<comments>http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/journalist-refuses-to-hand-over-real-ira-information-14289991.html?r=RSS#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 08:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[northernireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pressfreedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;Suzanne Breen, Sunday Tribune Northern Editor, has been threatened with legal action if she doesn&#39;t give up phones, computers, discs, notes and other material linked to two articles she has written on the paramilitary organisation.&#34; <a href="http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/journalist-refuses-to-hand-over-real-ira-information-14289991.html?r=RSS">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&quot;Suzanne Breen, Sunday Tribune Northern Editor, has been threatened with legal action if she doesn&#039;t give up phones, computers, discs, notes and other material linked to two articles she has written on the paramilitary organisation.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2009/05/04/belfast-telegraph-journalist-refuses-to-hand-over-real-ira-information/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spiegel Online: Telekom Accused of Tracking Journalists&#8217; Mobile Phone Signals</title>
		<link>http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/0,1518,556741,00.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/0,1518,556741,00.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;In addition to rifling through telephone records for a year from 2005 to 2006 to determine the extent of contacts between management and journalists, it now looks as though Telekom was also using mobile phone signals to keep track of their locations.&#34; <a href="http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/0,1518,556741,00.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&quot;In addition to rifling through telephone records for a year from 2005 to 2006 to determine the extent of contacts between management and journalists, it now looks as though Telekom was also using mobile phone signals to keep track of their locations.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2008/06/09/spiegel-online-telekom-accused-of-tracking-journalists-mobile-phone-signals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spiegel Online: German Corporate Spying Scandal Widens</title>
		<link>http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/0,1518,558510,00.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/0,1518,558510,00.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 12:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surviellance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;For years, Deutsche Telekom hired outside companies to spy on journalists and members of its own supervisory board, hoping to uncover internal leaks.&#34; <a href="http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/0,1518,558510,00.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&quot;For years, Deutsche Telekom hired outside companies to spy on journalists and members of its own supervisory board, hoping to uncover internal leaks.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2008/06/09/spiegel-online-german-corporate-spying-scandal-widens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reuters: Lufthansa used flight data to plug leak in board</title>
		<link>http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssTechMediaTelecomNews/idUSL0771405020080607?sp=true</link>
		<comments>http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssTechMediaTelecomNews/idUSL0771405020080607?sp=true#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 12:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[financialtimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;Lufthansa said it did an analysis of passenger movements in 1999 and 2000 to try to identify who on its 20-member supervisory board was regularly leaking information to [the FT Deutschland].&#34; <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssTechMediaTelecomNews/idUSL0771405020080607?sp=true">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&quot;Lufthansa said it did an analysis of passenger movements in 1999 and 2000 to try to identify who on its 20-member supervisory board was regularly leaking information to [the FT Deutschland].&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2008/06/09/reuters-lufthansa-used-flight-data-to-plug-leak-in-board/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Observer: User-friendly Apple shows a blogger its ruthless core</title>
		<link>http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2007/dec/23/apple</link>
		<comments>http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2007/dec/23/apple#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 10:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thinksecret]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Naughton: &#34;[ThinkSecret's Nick] Ciarelli is a student and a lone blogger, someone without resources who can be easily swatted. The blogosphere is full of such people, who sometimes publish stuff that is of public interest but which no mainstream outl <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2007/dec/23/apple">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[John Naughton: &quot;[ThinkSecret's Nick] Ciarelli is a student and a lone blogger, someone without resources who can be easily swatted. The blogosphere is full of such people, who sometimes publish stuff that is of public interest but which no mainstream outl]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2007/12/23/observer-user-friendly-apple-shows-a-blogger-its-ruthless-core/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rex Hammock: Sorry Virginia, There is no Think Secret</title>
		<link>http://www.rexblog.com/2007/12/20/17401/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rexblog.com/2007/12/20/17401/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 22:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thinksecret]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rex Hammock on the Apple/Think Secret settlement: &#34;Huh? 'Positive solution for both sides'? There’s another side here. My side. (I’m speaking collectively for readers, of course.) And there’s nothing positive about this settlement for my side.&#34; <a href="http://www.rexblog.com/2007/12/20/17401/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Rex Hammock on the Apple/Think Secret settlement: &quot;Huh? 'Positive solution for both sides'? There’s another side here. My side. (I’m speaking collectively for readers, of course.) And there’s nothing positive about this settlement for my side.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2007/12/21/rex-hammock-sorry-virginia-there-is-no-think-secret/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>International Herald Tribune: German reporter wins press freedom case in European Court of Human Rights</title>
		<link>http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/11/28/europe/28union.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/11/28/europe/28union.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Belgium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[echr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;In a ruling welcomed as a victory for freedom of the press, [the ECHR] has awarded damages to an investigative journalist whose home was raided and computers confiscated after he published reports alleging fraud within the European Union.&#34; <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/11/28/europe/28union.php">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&quot;In a ruling welcomed as a victory for freedom of the press, [the ECHR] has awarded damages to an investigative journalist whose home was raided and computers confiscated after he published reports alleging fraud within the European Union.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2007/11/29/international-herald-tribune-german-reporter-wins-press-freedom-case-in-european-court-of-human-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beltway Blogroll: A Shield For Bloggers &#8212; Or Maybe Not</title>
		<link>http://beltwayblogroll.nationaljournal.com/archives/2007/10/a_shield_for_bl.php</link>
		<comments>http://beltwayblogroll.nationaljournal.com/archives/2007/10/a_shield_for_bl.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shieldlaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;[T]he requirement that a 'substantial portion' of a blogger's livelihood come from gathering and publishing news will exclude most bloggers...&#34; <a href="http://beltwayblogroll.nationaljournal.com/archives/2007/10/a_shield_for_bl.php">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&quot;[T]he requirement that a 'substantial portion' of a blogger's livelihood come from gathering and publishing news will exclude most bloggers...&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2007/10/17/beltway-blogroll-a-shield-for-bloggers-or-maybe-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

