<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Martin Stabe &#187; shorturls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.martinstabe.com/shorturls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.martinstabe.com</link>
	<description>A UK-centric look at new media and online journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 10:32:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Wired.com: Twitter URL Service Bit.ly Says No to Ads, Yes to Data-Mining News</title>
		<link>http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/07/twitter-url-service-bitly-says-no-to-ads-yes-to-data-mining-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/07/twitter-url-service-bitly-says-no-to-ads-yes-to-data-mining-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bit.ly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shorturls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;[Bit.ly is] going to mine those links to create a real-time news service that would work somewhat like Twitter trends, except that it would track the hottest links rather than the most-used words. The result would be a Digg-like news service comprised of links determined to be important by bit.ly’s analysis engine.&#34; <a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/07/twitter-url-service-bitly-says-no-to-ads-yes-to-data-mining-news/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&quot;[Bit.ly is] going to mine those links to create a real-time news service that would work somewhat like Twitter trends, except that it would track the hottest links rather than the most-used words. The result would be a Digg-like news service comprised of links determined to be important by bit.ly’s analysis engine.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2009/08/10/wiredcom-twitter-url-service-bitly-says-no-to-ads-yes-to-data-mining-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Techcrunch: Bit.ly’s Grand Plans, And Their Inevitable Clash With Digg: Bitly Now</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/29/bitlys-grand-plans-and-their-inevitable-clash-with-digg-bitly-now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/29/bitlys-grand-plans-and-their-inevitable-clash-with-digg-bitly-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bit.ly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semantic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shorturls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;Bit.ly’s new Bit.ly Now service will show popular links at any given time, just like Digg (for now, Bit.ly sends the most popular link every hour to a twitter account). When Bit.ly Now launches, that link data will be combined with additional metadata about the URLs. In particular, they plan to extract important entities, people and topics from the stories in real time, allowing for a categorized approach to popular links. Bit.ly says they are talking to a number of third party services, including Reuter’s Open Calais, to help them do this.&#34; <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/29/bitlys-grand-plans-and-their-inevitable-clash-with-digg-bitly-now/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&quot;Bit.ly’s new Bit.ly Now service will show popular links at any given time, just like Digg (for now, Bit.ly sends the most popular link every hour to a twitter account). When Bit.ly Now launches, that link data will be combined with additional metadata about the URLs. In particular, they plan to extract important entities, people and topics from the stories in real time, allowing for a categorized approach to popular links. Bit.ly says they are talking to a number of third party services, including Reuter’s Open Calais, to help them do this.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2009/06/30/techcrunch-bitly%e2%80%99s-grand-plans-and-their-inevitable-clash-with-digg-bitly-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>louisgray.com: Are Your Writing Your Headlines for Google or for Twitter?</title>
		<link>http://www.louisgray.com/live/2009/04/are-your-writing-your-headlines-for.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.louisgray.com/live/2009/04/are-your-writing-your-headlines-for.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 21:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shorturls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;Now, instead of using the catchy headlines we once saw in print, or keyword-laden headlines that make Google giddy, we&#39;re now seeing headlines truncated to less than 140 characters, or even as low as 125 characters as the standard, assuming a short URL follows.&#34; <a href="http://www.louisgray.com/live/2009/04/are-your-writing-your-headlines-for.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&quot;Now, instead of using the catchy headlines we once saw in print, or keyword-laden headlines that make Google giddy, we&#039;re now seeing headlines truncated to less than 140 characters, or even as low as 125 characters as the standard, assuming a short URL follows.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2009/04/12/louisgraycom-are-your-writing-your-headlines-for-google-or-for-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Publishing 2.0: How Google Stole Control Over Content Distribution By Stealing Links</title>
		<link>http://publishing2.com/2009/04/11/how-google-stole-control-over-content-distribution-by-stealing-links/</link>
		<comments>http://publishing2.com/2009/04/11/how-google-stole-control-over-content-distribution-by-stealing-links/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 15:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shorturls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;The debate over whether Google’s excerpting content on its search result pages is a violation of copyright law, i.e. whether Google is effectively stealing content, overlooks the much more valuable asset that Google is appropriating. Google makes money less by its ability to display that snipet of content and much more by its ability to know that snipet of content is relevant to what the content consumer is looking for — it makes money by its ability to efficiently distribute that content.&#34; <a href="http://publishing2.com/2009/04/11/how-google-stole-control-over-content-distribution-by-stealing-links/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&quot;The debate over whether Google’s excerpting content on its search result pages is a violation of copyright law, i.e. whether Google is effectively stealing content, overlooks the much more valuable asset that Google is appropriating. Google makes money less by its ability to display that snipet of content and much more by its ability to know that snipet of content is relevant to what the content consumer is looking for — it makes money by its ability to efficiently distribute that content.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2009/04/12/publishing-20-how-google-stole-control-over-content-distribution-by-stealing-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

