<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Martin Stabe &#187; revenue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.martinstabe.com/revenue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.martinstabe.com</link>
	<description>A UK-centric look at new media and online journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 10:32:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Business Insider secrets revealed: An Inside Look At Our Readership And Financial Performance</title>
		<link>http://www.businessinsider.com/business-insider-the-full-monty-2011-3</link>
		<comments>http://www.businessinsider.com/business-insider-the-full-monty-2011-3#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 14:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[businessinsider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[startups]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;We only did only $5 million of revenue last year ($4.8 million, to be precise, of which most came from advertising). And, yes, $5 million of revenue is pretty puny in general. It&#039;s less than a single big network news anchor gets paid in a si... <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/business-insider-the-full-monty-2011-3">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&quot;We only did only $5 million of revenue last year ($4.8 million, to be precise, of which most came from advertising). And, yes, $5 million of revenue is pretty puny in general. It&#039;s less than a single big network news anchor gets paid in a single year, for example. But $5 million of revenue is a lot more revenue than we did three years ago ($39,495). And we&#039;re a few years younger than those other digital guys mentioned above. And we&#039;re on a similar trajectory. ... And did I mention that we were also profitable last year? ... We made $2,127 in 2010. ... We have about 45 full-timers on our team now, of which about 25 work in the newsroom, 10 in engineering, and 10 in sales and management.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2011/03/09/business-insider-secrets-revealed-an-inside-look-at-our-readership-and-financial-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strange Attractor: Honesty in the age of the paywall</title>
		<link>http://charman-anderson.com/2010/07/03/honesty-in-the-age-of-the-paywall/</link>
		<comments>http://charman-anderson.com/2010/07/03/honesty-in-the-age-of-the-paywall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 10:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kevin Anderson: &#34;The problem with newspapers’ digital strategies has been that they have largely been content strategies without effective commercial strategies. For too long at too many publications, digital advertising has simply been a sweetener bundled in with the print ad sales. For too long, we have not done enough to know our audiences online, understand their needs and adjust our strategies accordingly.&#34; <a href="http://charman-anderson.com/2010/07/03/honesty-in-the-age-of-the-paywall/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Kevin Anderson: &quot;The problem with newspapers’ digital strategies has been that they have largely been content strategies without effective commercial strategies. For too long at too many publications, digital advertising has simply been a sweetener bundled in with the print ad sales. For too long, we have not done enough to know our audiences online, understand their needs and adjust our strategies accordingly.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2010/07/06/strange-attractor-honesty-in-the-age-of-the-paywall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FT.com: Web 2.0 fails to produce cash</title>
		<link>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/6c968990-2b4c-11dd-a7fc-000077b07658.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/6c968990-2b4c-11dd-a7fc-000077b07658.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 12:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;Many members of the Web 2.0 generation of internet companies have so far produced little in the way of revenue, despite bringing about some significant changes in online behaviour, according to some of the entrepreneurs and financiers behind the movement <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/6c968990-2b4c-11dd-a7fc-000077b07658.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&quot;Many members of the Web 2.0 generation of internet companies have so far produced little in the way of revenue, despite bringing about some significant changes in online behaviour, according to some of the entrepreneurs and financiers behind the movement]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2008/05/27/ftcom-web-20-fails-to-produce-cash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guardian: The rise and rise of Google&#8217;s advertising revenue</title>
		<link>http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/interactive/2008/apr/18/googlerevenue</link>
		<comments>http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/interactive/2008/apr/18/googlerevenue#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 10:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interactive graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice chart showing Google's ad revenue relative to other media sectors. &#34;Only regional newspapers (forecast to be worth £2.33bn in 2008 and the commerical TV sector (£3.5bn...) still lie ahead.&#34; <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/interactive/2008/apr/18/googlerevenue">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Nice chart showing Google's ad revenue relative to other media sectors. &quot;Only regional newspapers (forecast to be worth £2.33bn in 2008 and the commerical TV sector (£3.5bn...) still lie ahead.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2008/04/19/guardian-the-rise-and-rise-of-googles-advertising-revenue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Observer: Web&#8217;s not yet warm enough to beat the chill</title>
		<link>http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/jan/06/pressandpublishing?gusrc=rss&#038;feed=media</link>
		<comments>http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/jan/06/pressandpublishing?gusrc=rss&#038;feed=media#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 10:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Preston: &#34;a 20 per cent growth rate on digital operations turns 5 per cent [of total newspapr company revenues] into 6 per cent in 12 months - not quite as impressive as those headline totals, or company report claims, might have you believe...&#34; <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/jan/06/pressandpublishing?gusrc=rss&#038;feed=media">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Peter Preston: &quot;a 20 per cent growth rate on digital operations turns 5 per cent [of total newspapr company revenues] into 6 per cent in 12 months - not quite as impressive as those headline totals, or company report claims, might have you believe...&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2008/01/06/observer-webs-not-yet-warm-enough-to-beat-the-chill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steve Yelvington: The rising value of the online user</title>
		<link>http://www.yelvington.com/node/292</link>
		<comments>http://www.yelvington.com/node/292#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 16:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve Yelvington: &#34;I continue to believe that the readership claims of newspaper websites are inflated by irrelevant, drive-by traffic that bloats the unique-user count and depresses derivatives such as revenue per user.&#34; <a href="http://www.yelvington.com/node/292">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Steve Yelvington: &quot;I continue to believe that the readership claims of newspaper websites are inflated by irrelevant, drive-by traffic that bloats the unique-user count and depresses derivatives such as revenue per user.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2007/09/30/steve-yelvington-the-rising-value-of-the-online-user/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Editor &amp; Publisher: Bank of America: Newspapers Should Be Getting More Credit for Online Transition</title>
		<link>http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003648547</link>
		<comments>http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003648547#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 16:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bank of America research analyst Joe Arns finds that US online newspaper readers are now worth about 36% to 55% of the value of print readers, up from 28% to 42% in Q2 2006. <a href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003648547">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Bank of America research analyst Joe Arns finds that US online newspaper readers are now worth about 36% to 55% of the value of print readers, up from 28% to 42% in Q2 2006.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2007/09/30/editor-publisher-bank-of-america-newspapers-should-be-getting-more-credit-for-online-transition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Telegraph.co.uk: Daily Mail sees ad revenues rise</title>
		<link>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2007/09/27/bcndmgt127.xml</link>
		<comments>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2007/09/27/bcndmgt127.xml#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[associated_newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmgt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[northcliffe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;The Daily Mail and General Trust has become the latest company to brush off fears that turmoil in the financial markets will hit its advertising revenues.&#34; <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2007/09/27/bcndmgt127.xml">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&quot;The Daily Mail and General Trust has become the latest company to brush off fears that turmoil in the financial markets will hit its advertising revenues.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2007/09/27/telegraphcouk-daily-mail-sees-ad-revenues-rise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FT.com: Local newspaper revenues plummet</title>
		<link>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1279892e-568d-11dc-ab9c-0000779fd2ac.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1279892e-568d-11dc-ab9c-0000779fd2ac.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 21:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classified]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[johnston_press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nwn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;The UK's local newspaper industry lost about £225m in revenue last year as regional publishers invested heavily online but failed to counter declining circulation and advertising revenue in print&#34; <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1279892e-568d-11dc-ab9c-0000779fd2ac.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&quot;The UK's local newspaper industry lost about £225m in revenue last year as regional publishers invested heavily online but failed to counter declining circulation and advertising revenue in print&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2007/08/30/ftcom-local-newspaper-revenues-plummet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christian Science Monitor: Fee content vs. free content</title>
		<link>http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0814/p09s01-coop.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0814/p09s01-coop.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 18:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times may drop pay-to-read content. But online ad revenue alone won't cut it.&#34; <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0814/p09s01-coop.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&quot;The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times may drop pay-to-read content. But online ad revenue alone won't cut it.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2007/08/14/christian-science-monitor-fee-content-vs-free-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Netzeitung: Stellenanzeigen bringen Zeitungen Zuwächse</title>
		<link>http://www.netzeitung.de/wirtschaft/unternehmen/687114.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.netzeitung.de/wirtschaft/unternehmen/687114.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 17:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[circulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;Der Boom am Arbeitsmarkt macht auch die Zeitungsverleger wieder optimistisch. Die Auflagen fallen weiter – aber immerhin schaffen die deutschen Zeitungen ein Umsatzplus.&#34; <a href="http://www.netzeitung.de/wirtschaft/unternehmen/687114.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&quot;Der Boom am Arbeitsmarkt macht auch die Zeitungsverleger wieder optimistisch. Die Auflagen fallen weiter – aber immerhin schaffen die deutschen Zeitungen ein Umsatzplus.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2007/07/03/netzeitung-stellenanzeigen-bringen-zeitungen-zuwachse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advertising Age: CNN the TV Channel Is No Match for CNN the Website</title>
		<link>http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=117244</link>
		<comments>http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=117244#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CNN's ratings have been on a steady decline since 2003 ... Traffic continues to climb over at CNN.com, however, with unique users up nearly 25% to 26 million in April compared with the same period last year plus 90 million subscribers to CNN Mobile. <a href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=117244">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[CNN's ratings have been on a steady decline since 2003 ... Traffic continues to climb over at CNN.com, however, with unique users up nearly 25% to 26 million in April compared with the same period last year plus 90 million subscribers to CNN Mobile.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2007/06/14/advertising-age-cnn-the-tv-channel-is-no-match-for-cnn-the-website/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

