<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Martin Stabe &#187; plagiarism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.martinstabe.com/plagiarism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.martinstabe.com</link>
	<description>A UK-centric look at new media and online journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 10:32:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hartford Courant: Courant Reviews Aggregation Policy</title>
		<link>http://www.courant.com/news/breaking/hc-courant-aggregation-statement-0829,0,1621524.story</link>
		<comments>http://www.courant.com/news/breaking/hc-courant-aggregation-statement-0829,0,1621524.story#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 18:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plagiarism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;Last week, The Courant received a letter from The Journal Inquirer managing editor that prompted it to review our aggregation strategy. We found that there were legitimate points of concern. Most importantly, we discovered a mistake in our editing process when we take articles from our website to our print newspaper. We found that we inappropriately dropped the attribution or proper credit and in some cases credited ourselves with a byline to a Courant reporter. Once made aware of this mistake, The Courant took immediate steps to correct the process. <a href="http://www.courant.com/news/breaking/hc-courant-aggregation-statement-0829,0,1621524.story">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&quot;Last week, The Courant received a letter from The Journal Inquirer managing editor that prompted it to review our aggregation strategy. We found that there were legitimate points of concern. Most importantly, we discovered a mistake in our editing process when we take articles from our website to our print newspaper. We found that we inappropriately dropped the attribution or proper credit and in some cases credited ourselves with a byline to a Courant reporter. Once made aware of this mistake, The Courant took immediate steps to correct the process.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2009/09/01/hartford-courant-courant-reviews-aggregation-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York: Did Toby Young Plagiarize Passages From the ‘Times’ For ‘How to Lose Friends &amp; Alienate People’?</title>
		<link>http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2008/10/did_toby_young_plagiarize_pass.html</link>
		<comments>http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2008/10/did_toby_young_plagiarize_pass.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 15:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Toby Young: &#34;I don&#39;t think it&#39;s a sort of mealy-mouthed or weasely defense to say that the standard that British journalists are expected to hold themselves to are not as high as the standards that some American journalists hold,&#34; he explained. &#34;We&#39;re a little less precious about this kind of thing.&#34; (via Romenesko) <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2008/10/did_toby_young_plagiarize_pass.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Toby Young: &quot;I don&#39;t think it&#39;s a sort of mealy-mouthed or weasely defense to say that the standard that British journalists are expected to hold themselves to are not as high as the standards that some American journalists hold,&quot; he explained. &quot;We&#39;re a little less precious about this kind of thing.&quot; (via Romenesko)]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2008/10/07/new-york-did-toby-young-plagiarize-passages-from-the-%e2%80%98times%e2%80%99-for-%e2%80%98how-to-lose-friends-alienate-people%e2%80%99/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meranda Writes: What do you say about suspected plagiarism?</title>
		<link>http://merandawrites.com/2008/01/17/what-do-you-say-about-suspected-plagiarism/</link>
		<comments>http://merandawrites.com/2008/01/17/what-do-you-say-about-suspected-plagiarism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plagiarism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What's the correct response to seeing words you wrote appear verbatim in another publication? <a href="http://merandawrites.com/2008/01/17/what-do-you-say-about-suspected-plagiarism/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[What's the correct response to seeing words you wrote appear verbatim in another publication?]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2008/01/18/meranda-writes-what-do-you-say-about-suspected-plagiarism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Regret the Error: NY Sun names fired CBS producer; why naming her is important</title>
		<link>http://www.regrettheerror.com/2007/04/ny_sun_names_fi.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.regrettheerror.com/2007/04/ny_sun_names_fi.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 23:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Blum of the New York Sun has named the producer fired in the CBS plagiarism incident. Craig Silverman explains why journalists insist on naming names in cases of plagiarism. (Ahem: &#34;Even student newspapers do it.&#34;) <a href="http://www.regrettheerror.com/2007/04/ny_sun_names_fi.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[David Blum of the New York Sun has named the producer fired in the CBS plagiarism incident. Craig Silverman explains why journalists insist on naming names in cases of plagiarism. (Ahem: &quot;Even student newspapers do it.&quot;)]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2007/04/13/regret-the-error-ny-sun-names-fired-cbs-producer-why-naming-her-is-important/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York Times: After Couric Incident, CBS News to Scrutinize Its Web Content</title>
		<link>http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/arts/television/12cbs.html?ex=1334030400&#038;en=03e1d73aa3cec934&#038;ei=5088&#038;partner=rssnyt&#038;emc=rss</link>
		<comments>http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/arts/television/12cbs.html?ex=1334030400&#038;en=03e1d73aa3cec934&#038;ei=5088&#038;partner=rssnyt&#038;emc=rss#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 23:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;CBS News said yesterday it planned to install a new level of editorial oversight to its Web site since revelations that the CBS anchor Katie Couric read a plagiarized commentary on the site last week.&#34; <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/arts/television/12cbs.html?ex=1334030400&#038;en=03e1d73aa3cec934&#038;ei=5088&#038;partner=rssnyt&#038;emc=rss">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&quot;CBS News said yesterday it planned to install a new level of editorial oversight to its Web site since revelations that the CBS anchor Katie Couric read a plagiarized commentary on the site last week.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2007/04/13/new-york-times-after-couric-incident-cbs-news-to-scrutinize-its-web-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

