Computerworld: Surprise! Young users most in tune with online privacy

"The Pew survey of 2,253 Americans found that people aged 18 to 29 are more likely than older adults to take steps to limit others from accessing their personal information online. The study results, released Wednesday, noted that 44% of younger adults try to protect their information, compared to 33% of users between 30 and 49, and 25% of those between 50 and 64."

BuzzMachine: Confusing *a* public with *the* public

Jeff Jarvis: "Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg seem to assume that once something is public, it’s public. They confused sharing with publishing. They conflate the public sphere with the making of a public. That is, when I blog something, I am publishing it to the world for anyone and everyone to see: the more the better, is the assumption. But when I put something on Facebook my assumption had been that I was sharing it just with the public I created and control there."

Shane Richmond: Naming Nightjack: The Times was right legally but wrong morally

Shane Richmond: "I can see the sense in both The Times's argument and Mr Justice Eady's. The legal case is clear but I'm less comfortable with the moral case. Nightjack was trying to shed light on his work and bring the public a view of policing that could only be done anonymously. Shouldn't newspapers be protecting people like him? Certainly, The Times would have protected him had he been their source. But being out on his own meant that he was fair game."

PC Bloggs: The Real Blows in Life

Another blogging cop writes: "I do ... think it is ironic that police blogger Nightjack's identity has been revealed by the ruling of a judge who on the same day ruled that the Beckhams' old nanny must make a formal apology for breaching their confidence some years ago. Of course, the Beckhams aren't bloggers, just international celebrities whose lives are generally available for public consumption. So clearly they require more protection than an erstwhile Lancashire detective constable who donates his off-duty earnings to charity."

One Man and His Blog: The Times vrs NightJack: Destroying Journalists’ Reputation

Adam Tinworth: "I think that it's absolutely despicable that a journalistic operation did this. The 'public interest' figleaf they're using blows away the second you consider that they've made it easier for people to connect the blog posts with real cases, not harder."