rights


New York Times: Passenger Hailed as Hero Quickly Finds Spotlight Can Have a Harsh Glow

Tuesday, 29 December 2009, 10:04

"[Jasper Schuringa]’s work with the news media outlets raised questions: Was he inappropriately profiting from a national-security incident? And should broadcast networks and newspapers be paying for photo rights from sources they interviewed? Given the changing tone in the coverage, Mr. Schuringa appeared to rethink his approach."

Continue Reading Add comment

Mediaite: CNN Pays For Cell Phone Image, Plane “Hero” Wants Payment For Interviews

Tuesday, 29 December 2009, 09:59

"CNN clarifies the network did not pay for the actual interview during CNN Newsroom. However, there’s a reason Schuringa has not appeared any further on CNN or any other network – we hear he has asked for additional payment for any future interviews. The practice of paying a 'licensing fee' rather than a direct exchange is a way networks who claim to never pay for interviews can get around the issue. By paying for images and video, they are free to say no money was exchanged hands for the actual interview."

Continue Reading Add comment

Gawker: The Shady Mainstream Media Payday of Flight 253 Hero Jasper Schuringa

Tuesday, 29 December 2009, 09:57

I'm really struggling to understand why the US media is so annoyed about this: "[Jasper Schuringa] sold the 'TV Rights' of the first of his two photos to CNN for $10K. The 'print rights' went to the Post for $5K. Later, Schuringa was paid upwards of $3K by ABC News for a second photo, which Schuringa tried to sell to other local news outlets for $5K, unsuccessfully. Jasper Schuringa made at least $18,000 from two shitty, blurry photos."

Continue Reading Add comment

Reuters Editors: Rethinking rights, accreditation, and journalism itself in the age of Twitter | Blogs |

Friday, 26 June 2009, 11:09

David Schlesinger: "Fundamentally, the old media won’t control news dissemination in the future. And organisations can’t control access using old forms of accreditation any more."

Continue Reading 1 comment

AllThingsD: The NCAA Blows the Whistle on Twitter’s “March Tweetness”

Saturday, 4 April 2009, 09:06

"{Federated Media] has taken down [March Tweetness] at the request of the National Collegiate Athletic Association … The college sports group, which keeps a tight grip on any and all trademarks related to its teams, games and tournaments, says the site infringed on its copyrights."

Continue Reading Add comment

 Saturday, 26 April 2008, 09:01 0

"The explosion of new media, especially with regard to advertising income, has made competitors out of two traditional allies — news media and professional sports."

 Monday, 31 March 2008, 17:56 0

Regional news site Twitters live coverage of a baseball game. Place your bets: How long will it take for Major League Baseball’s lawyers to attempt to ban this practice on the grounds of protecting exclusive data rights?

 Wednesday, 5 March 2008, 17:20 0

"In the letter, sent Tuesday to Baseball Commissioner Allan H. "Bud" Selig, the nine-year-old group objected to the new restrictions that include limits on the number of game photos online and the duration of time video can be placed on a Web site."

 Saturday, 1 March 2008, 20:17 0

"Major League Baseball wants to ban news sites from publishing galleries of baseball game photos, and media outlets aren’t happy about it."

 Saturday, 23 February 2008, 14:40 0

"If you’re the "bearer" a [Major League Baseball] press pass, here are some of the new, unbearable rules…"

 Tuesday, 22 January 2008, 21:04 0

"Photographers at the Indianapolis Star have come up with a novel way to follow the NFL’s guidelines and produce video-like multimedia content — using time-lapse photography to create audio slideshows that look like video."

 Wednesday, 2 January 2008, 16:48 1

"The NCAA issued new rules this week that will allow credentialed press to blog live NCAA championship sporting events. The rules, however, limit the number of times reporters can post live blogs depending on the sport they cover." (via Guardian/PDA)

 Friday, 9 November 2007, 16:09 0

"Australian cricket authorities came under fire on Friday for preventing some news organisations from covering the first test match against Sri Lanka, as a boycott of the event by international news groups continued."

 Saturday, 8 September 2007, 09:41 0

"The World Cup, established only in 1987, is expected to draw a worldwide television audience of 4 billion over the next six weeks and generate $200 million in revenues, according to data compiled by Sportcal, a London sports consultancy."

Previous Posts