<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Martin Stabe &#187; Qatar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.martinstabe.com/category/global/middle-east/qatar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.martinstabe.com</link>
	<description>A UK-centric look at new media and online journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:09:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>ArabianBusiness.com: Concerns over Al Jazeera&#8217;s Saudi coverage</title>
		<link>http://www.martinstabe.com/2007/12/14/arabianbusinesscom-concerns-over-al-jazeeras-saudi-coverage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.martinstabe.com/2007/12/14/arabianbusinesscom-concerns-over-al-jazeeras-saudi-coverage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 08:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Qatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aljazeera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[del.icio.us Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saudiarabia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;Concerns have been raised that Qatar's Al Jazeera television is dumbing down its coverage of Saudi Arabian affairs following the kingdom's decision to allow the popular Arab network to cover the Haj pilgrimage.&#34;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[&quot;Concerns have been raised that Qatar's Al Jazeera television is dumbing down its coverage of Saudi Arabian affairs following the kingdom's decision to allow the popular Arab network to cover the Haj pilgrimage.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2007/12/14/arabianbusinesscom-concerns-over-al-jazeeras-saudi-coverage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Al-Jazeera won&#8217;t get its memo</title>
		<link>http://www.martinstabe.com/2006/01/17/al-jazeera-wont-get-its-memo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.martinstabe.com/2006/01/17/al-jazeera-wont-get-its-memo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 23:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellanea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[al-Jazeera]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martinstabe.com/blog/?p=1375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Al-Jazeera has filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the Cabinet Office, asking for a transcript of the 2004 meeting between George Bush and Tony Blair during which Bush allegedly suggested bombing the station&#8217;s headquarters in Qatar. When somebody beat them to this approach by nearly a month, the response was predictable &#8212; although [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al-Jazeera has <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1989009,00.html">filed a Freedom of Information Act request</a> with the Cabinet Office, asking for a transcript of the 2004 meeting between <strong>George Bush</strong> and <strong>Tony Blair</strong> during which Bush allegedly suggested bombing the station&rsquo;s headquarters in Qatar. </p>
<p>When somebody beat them to this approach by nearly a month, <a href="http://foia.blogspot.com/2005/12/al-jazeera-memo-i-received-this-reply.html">the response was predictable</a> &mdash; although the Cabinet Office admitted holding the requested information, they refused disclosure based on the section 27 (detrimental to international relations) exemption to FOIA.</p>
<p>But <em>Newsnight</em> tonight reported that a Downing Street spokesman responded to questions about al-Jazeera&rsquo;s request by <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4621676.stm">denying that the document contained any reference to bombing al-Jazeera</a>. </p>
<p>I suspect that when it comes 19 working days from now, the formal FOIA response will look a lot like the one <strong>Steve Wood</strong> received last month (<a href="http://foia.blogspot.com/Wood.pdf">PDF</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.martinstabe.com/2006/01/17/al-jazeera-wont-get-its-memo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

