Sunday, 2 March 2008, 08:49
Comments
Leo Docherty: "Rather than highlighting the appalling truths about the war in Helmand, the media, dazzled by the heroic ideal that Prince Harry so perfectly embodies, perpetuate the myth that this is a just war fit for heroes. The frenzy of coverage in Fr
Sunday, 2 March 2008, 08:36
Comments
Peter Preston: "There’s no point in criticising anyone involved in this deluded little charade, because everyone acted from perfectly comprehensible motives. …"
Saturday, 1 March 2008, 19:47
Comments
Bob Steele: "That term “informal embargo” has a stench about it. It reeks of a backroom deal where an important ethical principle - independence - ends up in the spittoon."
Saturday, 1 March 2008, 19:45
Comments
Bob Satchwell: "In fact media blackouts are not that unusual. We do not report kidnaps, at the request of the police, if a hostage’s life might be a risk. We often know about the movements of politicians or royalty so that coverage can be planned but do n
Saturday, 1 March 2008, 19:43
Comments
Jon Snow: "One wonders whether viewers, readers and listeners will ever want to trust media bosses again. Or perhaps this was a courageous editorial decision to protect this fine young man?"
Saturday, 1 March 2008, 19:42
Comments
PR guru Max Clifford’s come out unexpectedly fiercely in criticising what he regards as an ill-thought out publicity stunt. "It just comes across, the whole thing, as a very, very calculated public relations exercise," he claims
Saturday, 1 March 2008, 19:40
Comments
At the foot of The Sun’s report: "Set your desktop with Prince Harry wallpaper"
Saturday, 1 March 2008, 19:37
Comments
Jon Williams: "We don’t do this stuff lightly - there are no other "voluntary agreements" in place at the moment, there’s nothing else we’re not telling you.""
Saturday, 1 March 2008, 19:35
Comments
Tim Marshall: "There will be people wishing to use this incident to prove that the British media is supine in the face of Government pressure. That is a nonsense. The next time the Government screws up we will again give them a kicking."
Saturday, 1 March 2008, 19:34
Comments
Simon Bucks: "Where Drudge got the [Harry in Afghanistan] story from is a mystery - some suspect an element of the British media which wanted to break the story for its own ends."
Saturday, 1 March 2008, 19:29
Comments
"Some eyebrows have been raised about the quid pro quo involved: in return for keeping quiet every media outlet was supposed to get a slice of the story. That’s hardly a surprise and, again, not controversial. Just good sense really."
Saturday, 1 March 2008, 19:24
Comments
Charlie Beckett: "I am genuinely surprised at the lack of unease exhibited by the British media about this deal. … I just think it reeks of the mainstream media complicity and arrogance that was supposed to be a thing of the past."
Saturday, 1 March 2008, 19:15
Comments
"Journalists in America routinely keep quiet about the travel plans of government officials to Iraq and other hostile regions. …"
Saturday, 1 March 2008, 19:11
Comments
"the British press were given special access to the prince in return for the silence. But they probably would have remained silent anyway. … An extraordinary display of acting like pussies …"









