Online Journalism Blog: Reasons not to ignore comments #2: The Daily Mail and Julie Moult
Thursday, 4 September 2008, 22:27 via Delicious/martinstabe
Paul Bradshaw puts the Julie Moult story into context: "The Bloggerheads blogger (’Manic’), frustrated by [the Daily Mail story's] inaccuracies, posted a comment on the story correcting it. Because that’s what comments are for, right? Apparently not. The comment was not published. So Manic took things up a notch." Read More...
Entry Filed under: comments, daily_mail, del.icio.us Links, interactivity, links, seo
Additional comments powered by BackType
1 Comment Add some more of your own
1. Mark Williams | 19 January 2009 at 0918
I think that what ever you write which is good for society .
That is Journalism and no matter through which via-media you are expressing your thoughts.
Whether it is online or any other media
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed