Attention journalists: Focus on blog signal, not noise

Sunday, 11 February 2007, 13:06

SundayAM, 11/2/2007

There are clearly still many journalists who don’t quite understand the phenomenon of blogging and are willing to throw the baby out with the bathwater because there are some bloggers who they don’t like (and who don’t like them).

A perfect example was Independent columnist Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, who sparred with political blogger Iain Dale on Andrew Marr’s Sunday AM programme this morning (RealAudio video @ approx 29:00).

Alibhai-Brown has plenty of reasons to be aggrieved about blogs, of course. As a liberal columnist, she has been on the receiving end of some incredibly vitriolic abuse from some of the less civilised sections of Britain’s right wing political blogosphere.

The problem is that she, like so many others, confuses message with medium and equates all bloggers with the her (relatively) small number of right-wing detractors, from whom she says she has even received threats and intimidation.

Blogging, she said, “is the equivalent of going to the pub and listening to complete bores sounding off.”

The problem, of course, is that alongside bores and crazies, pubs also entertain experts in any given field discussing the issues they encounter in their professional lives. There are also plenty of rational, ordinary people with interesting stories to tell about the challenges they face in their lives.

“I hope that [blogging] keeps growing and growing until it collapses because nobody will have time to read it all,” Alibhai-Brown to close the segment.

But it has already reached that point. Nobody can read all 60-odd million blogs. The vast majority of blogs have a readership that you could count on your fingers and toes. And there’s a reason for that: most blogs are interesting only to the bloggers themselves and five of their best friends.

Because blogs cost nearly nothing to produce, there is no pressure to publish only the best-quality material. Unlike big media’s edit-then-publish model, blogs operate on a publish-then-edit model.

In the age of information overload, journalists must be experts at using filtering technologies like Google and Technorati — not to mention their own critical judgment — to help guide their time-pressed readers to separate signal from noise.

Unfortunately, many journalists, like Alibhai-Brown, continue to focus instead on the noise, missing the signal in the process.

They walk into the pub, hear the banter of drunken idiots in the front, and walk out in disgust — not realising that they are missing a lively and well-informed discussion going on at the quiet table in the back.

Entry Filed under: 18 Doughty Street, BBC, Blogs, Independent, Journalism, Newspapers

  • YAB wrote an awful column for the Indy in which she fulminated about bloggers for being boring and self-obsessed, while wondering how on earth they had the time (and surely that must mean the rest of their life is rubbish etc).

    "But Yasmin, you write a *column*," I thought. "Sometimes it's boring, and pretty much all columns are self-obsessed."

    "And you're all over the telly."

    "And the radio."

    "And the newspapers, come to think of it. How do you find the time?"
  • Bobbie, Yes, I remember it well.

    Justin McKeating did a rather thorough job demolishing her argument.

    There was one other part of the Dale/YAB exchange that I cut out of this post:

    "There are some bloggers who occasionally hit upon the germ of a story," she said.

    "A bit like columnists, then," Dale interjected.

    "Well, I don't break stories — I opine," she answered. "This isn't about me. This is about — do you really want to suggest that bores in bars are telling us truths that we in newspapers aren't?"

    Later in the programme, Dale returned to this issue:

    "I didn't go into blogging to break stories. I went into blogging because I had things to say about political issues of the day, and I wanted to have a platform to say them, and I wanted to have a conversation with people.
  • I think part of the reason that some journalists come to these conclusions is that it is precisely as you put it is the poeple sitting round the quiet table at the back having interesting conversations.

    It's not just the banter of drunken idiots you could compare the nasty ones to, you could day they are vile drunken bullies, spouting venom at anyone who doesn't agree - and telling them when they ask a question that actually 'the conversation is over' anyway.

    If the woman has had death threats, is it really hard to follow that she hasn't delved further? Also, the same people in that pub may mask the nice sensible people in the back by fighting amongst themselves - and that's over a load of claims and counter claims that they can't prove.

    I didn't like the way Andrew Marr quizzed Mr Dale on why it was 'right wing' bloggers who had more to say. The Ministry of Truth and Bloggerheads seem a pretty addictive couple of blogs to me.

    All best.
  • That's all best and I'm sorry about the atrocious spelling - it's late. :)
blog comments powered by Disqus

Martin StabeA UK-centric look at new media and online journalism.
 
 

Subscribe to this site (RSS)


Subscribe with Bloglines
Add to Google
Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Contact Information

As seen on...

Tags

Latest Photographs

IMG_3898IMG_3870IMG_3869IMG_3866IMG_3861IMG_3860IMG_3859IMG_3857