<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s worse: dead trees or energy-hungry computers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/02/03/whats-worse-dead-trees-or-energy-hungry-networks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/02/03/whats-worse-dead-trees-or-energy-hungry-networks/</link>
	<description>A UK-centric look at new media and online journalism</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: color_chart</title>
		<link>http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/02/03/whats-worse-dead-trees-or-energy-hungry-networks/#comment-49994</link>
		<dc:creator>color_chart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 20:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/02/03/whats-worse-dead-trees-or-energy-hungry-networks/#comment-49994</guid>
		<description>I heard about waterless printing a while back but it hasnt really taken off as much as i hoped it would... its a shame because on a larger scale it could really make an impact .. Id love to see a comparison of the results of waterless printing and regular printing, i bet its not that different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard about waterless printing a while back but it hasnt really taken off as much as i hoped it would&#8230; its a shame because on a larger scale it could really make an impact .. Id love to see a comparison of the results of waterless printing and regular printing, i bet its not that different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kirkham</title>
		<link>http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/02/03/whats-worse-dead-trees-or-energy-hungry-networks/#comment-47775</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirkham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/02/03/whats-worse-dead-trees-or-energy-hungry-networks/#comment-47775</guid>
		<description>Yes Adam, interesting stuff if not so worrying.

There is a relatively new printing process called waterless printing.

It's still in it's infancy with only a small number of presses worldwide.

Sometimes referred to as dry offset, it's a process that does not use water, alcohol  or standard inks. The inks used are vegetable based.

In addition the process uses aroung 40% less paper for setting up the presses.

A standard range of documents can be printed using this process including full colour sales &#38; marketing material.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Adam, interesting stuff if not so worrying.</p>
<p>There is a relatively new printing process called waterless printing.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s still in it&#8217;s infancy with only a small number of presses worldwide.</p>
<p>Sometimes referred to as dry offset, it&#8217;s a process that does not use water, alcohol  or standard inks. The inks used are vegetable based.</p>
<p>In addition the process uses aroung 40% less paper for setting up the presses.</p>
<p>A standard range of documents can be printed using this process including full colour sales &amp; marketing material.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online media is greener than print — but only for some time &#124; Martin Stabe</title>
		<link>http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/02/03/whats-worse-dead-trees-or-energy-hungry-networks/#comment-47544</link>
		<dc:creator>Online media is greener than print — but only for some time &#124; Martin Stabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 11:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/02/03/whats-worse-dead-trees-or-energy-hungry-networks/#comment-47544</guid>
		<description>[...] A study conducted by the Carbon Trust and newspaper group Trinity Mirror in late 2006 found that each copy of the Mirror produces 174 grams of CO2. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A study conducted by the Carbon Trust and newspaper group Trinity Mirror in late 2006 found that each copy of the Mirror produces 174 grams of CO2. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MediaShift . Digging Deeper::Web Leads, Print Pubs Improve Environmental Impact &#124; PBS</title>
		<link>http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/02/03/whats-worse-dead-trees-or-energy-hungry-networks/#comment-18032</link>
		<dc:creator>MediaShift . Digging Deeper::Web Leads, Print Pubs Improve Environmental Impact &#124; PBS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 07:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/02/03/whats-worse-dead-trees-or-energy-hungry-networks/#comment-18032</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] What&#8217;s worse? Dead trees or energy-hungry computers? by Martin Stabe [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] What&#8217;s worse? Dead trees or energy-hungry computers? by Martin Stabe [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Will paper kill the papers?</title>
		<link>http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/02/03/whats-worse-dead-trees-or-energy-hungry-networks/#comment-17127</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Will paper kill the papers?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 20:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/02/03/whats-worse-dead-trees-or-energy-hungry-networks/#comment-17127</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] of the Daily Mirror in the UK found that each copy of that newspaper causes the release of 174g of CO2, much of which is accounted for by paper [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] of the Daily Mirror in the UK found that each copy of that newspaper causes the release of 174g of CO2, much of which is accounted for by paper [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wordblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What is the carbon footprint of the internet?</title>
		<link>http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/02/03/whats-worse-dead-trees-or-energy-hungry-networks/#comment-13527</link>
		<dc:creator>Wordblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What is the carbon footprint of the internet?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 11:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/02/03/whats-worse-dead-trees-or-energy-hungry-networks/#comment-13527</guid>
		<description>[...] Martin Stabe has also posted on this. He has some interesting information on the printing industry and gives the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Martin Stabe has also posted on this. He has some interesting information on the printing industry and gives the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Monck</title>
		<link>http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/02/03/whats-worse-dead-trees-or-energy-hungry-networks/#comment-13519</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Monck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 09:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/02/03/whats-worse-dead-trees-or-energy-hungry-networks/#comment-13519</guid>
		<description>Excellent point, Martin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent point, Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cybersoc.com</title>
		<link>http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/02/03/whats-worse-dead-trees-or-energy-hungry-networks/#comment-16462</link>
		<dc:creator>cybersoc.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/02/03/whats-worse-dead-trees-or-energy-hungry-networks/#comment-16462</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt; Martin Stabe asks "What's worse: dead trees or energy-hungry computers?" &lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%--> Martin Stabe asks &#8220;What&#8217;s worse: dead trees or energy-hungry computers?&#8221; <!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One Man &#38; His Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/02/03/whats-worse-dead-trees-or-energy-hungry-networks/#comment-16463</link>
		<dc:creator>One Man &#38; His Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/02/03/whats-worse-dead-trees-or-energy-hungry-networks/#comment-16463</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;   Both Martin Stabe and Wordblog picked up on my post last week musing on the relative environmental impact of print against online publishing.     Posted by Adam in Publishing on February 6, 2007 7:07 PM  Permalink &#124; Comments (0)&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->   Both Martin Stabe and Wordblog picked up on my post last week musing on the relative environmental impact of print against online publishing.     Posted by Adam in Publishing on February 6, 2007 7:07 PM  Permalink | Comments (0)<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cybersoc.com</title>
		<link>http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/02/03/whats-worse-dead-trees-or-energy-hungry-networks/#comment-16464</link>
		<dc:creator>cybersoc.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/02/03/whats-worse-dead-trees-or-energy-hungry-networks/#comment-16464</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt; Martin Stabe asks "What's worse: dead trees or energy-hungry computers?" &lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%--> Martin Stabe asks &#8220;What&#8217;s worse: dead trees or energy-hungry computers?&#8221; <!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Journerdism - News and commentary on journalism, multimedia, web 2.0 developments, web and print design and all things nerdy by</title>
		<link>http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/02/03/whats-worse-dead-trees-or-energy-hungry-networks/#comment-16465</link>
		<dc:creator>Journerdism - News and commentary on journalism, multimedia, web 2.0 developments, web and print design and all things nerdy by</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/2007/02/03/whats-worse-dead-trees-or-energy-hungry-networks/#comment-16465</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;Mooninite Tee :: Adult Swim :: Raplica.com  Awesome and kinda reasonably priced! … Seriously, $17-$20+ t-shirts can go die.   Print reporters, homeless people and video  Mr. Waite’s all up on this interesting story.   What’s worse: dead trees or energy-hungry computers?  Interesting discussion on environmental impact of electronic news vs. print (focused on CO2 emissions). I think the bigger issue is electronic news’ dependency on computers and their toxic parts and the lack of effective computer recycling programs&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->Mooninite Tee :: Adult Swim :: Raplica.com  Awesome and kinda reasonably priced! … Seriously, $17-$20+ t-shirts can go die.   Print reporters, homeless people and video  Mr. Waite’s all up on this interesting story.   What’s worse: dead trees or energy-hungry computers?  Interesting discussion on environmental impact of electronic news vs. print (focused on CO2 emissions). I think the bigger issue is electronic news’ dependency on computers and their toxic parts and the lack of effective computer recycling programs<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
