Entry Filed under: AOL,Online,del.icio.us Links,links,timewarner,tmz

1 Comment Add some more of your own

  • 1. chrism | 30 June 2009 at 1237

    It's just the British model of magazine publishing – quick, cheap and dirty. As opposed to the overstaffed, overengineered American one (see Portfolio). As somebody loosely involved in the vastly successful launch of Maxim in the USA, I was always amused when American publishing people boggled at how few people could produce a million-seller. But maybe they're finally realising that a low cost base is a good thing. The mainstream publishers will have a struggle tearing themselves away from the days of the Editor-in-Chief's limo to lunch, though.

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

Additional comments powered by BackType

Entry Filed under: AOL,Online,del.icio.us Links,links,timewarner,tmz

1 Comment Add some more of your own

  • 1. chrism | 30 June 2009 at 1237

    It's just the British model of magazine publishing – quick, cheap and dirty. As opposed to the overstaffed, overengineered American one (see Portfolio). As somebody loosely involved in the vastly successful launch of Maxim in the USA, I was always amused when American publishing people boggled at how few people could produce a million-seller. But maybe they're finally realising that a low cost base is a good thing. The mainstream publishers will have a struggle tearing themselves away from the days of the Editor-in-Chief's limo to lunch, though.

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

Additional comments powered by BackType