Recovering Journalist: Who’s Doing Good Work in Online News? (Part 2)
Thursday, 12 February 2009, 23:13 via Delicious/martinstabe
Mark Potts: "[An] excellent view of the Australian fire story comes from a somewhat unexpected source: Wikipedia, whose entry on the fires is voluminous, comprehensive and up-to-the-minute. A lot of journalists like to knock Wikipedia because it's user-generated and therefore vulnerable to inaccuracies; in fact, the site is surprisingly accurate for most purposes and is turning out to be a very underrated collector of breaking news coverage. " Read More...
Entry Filed under: Journalism,Online,Wikipedia,del.icio.us Links,innovation,links
Additional comments powered by BackType











Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed