http://www.martinstabe.com/2005/06/06/on-the-web-news-is-old-in-36-hours/ A UK-centric look at new media and online journalism Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:09:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 http://www.martinstabe.com/2005/06/06/on-the-web-news-is-old-in-36-hours/comment-page-1/#comment-34826 cybersoc.com: social software Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:18:11 +0000 http://martinstabe.com/blog2/?p=792#comment-34826 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] out that the "new" research I blogged about in the previous post was actually itself more than 36 hours old. Martin, by the way, blogged along the same lines as I did but manages to do so a bit more [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] out that the "new" research I blogged about in the previous post was actually itself more than 36 hours old. Martin, by the way, blogged along the same lines as I did but manages to do so a bit more [...]

]]> http://www.martinstabe.com/2005/06/06/on-the-web-news-is-old-in-36-hours/comment-page-1/#comment-17063 Press Gazette Blogs - Fleet Street 2.0 » Newspaper archives and the Long Tail Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:37:50 +0000 http://martinstabe.com/blog2/?p=792#comment-17063 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] that’s the study that was first reported more than a year ago when it was first published, right? So much for the 36-hour theory of old [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] that’s the study that was first reported more than a year ago when it was first published, right? So much for the 36-hour theory of old [...]

]]> http://www.martinstabe.com/2005/06/06/on-the-web-news-is-old-in-36-hours/comment-page-1/#comment-883 Blog Watches Dog » Blog Archive » Newspaper archives and the Long Tail Tue, 11 Jul 2006 13:23:00 +0000 http://martinstabe.com/blog2/?p=792#comment-883 [...] Surely that’s the study that was first reported more than a year ago when it was first published, right? So much for the 36-hour theory of old news! [...] [...] Surely that’s the study that was first reported more than a year ago when it was first published, right? So much for the 36-hour theory of old news! [...]

]]> http://www.martinstabe.com/2005/06/06/on-the-web-news-is-old-in-36-hours/comment-page-1/#comment-16459 Teaching Online Journalism Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://martinstabe.com/blog2/?p=792#comment-16459 <!--%kramer-pre%-->): Fifteen Minutes of Fame: The Dynamics of Information Access on the Web, by Z. Dezso, E. Almaas, A. Lukács, B. Rácz, I. Szakadát, and A.-L. Barabási, published in arXiv:physics/0505087 June 6, 2005: Martin Stabe writes that Der Spiegel wrote (in German) about this study (their article is dated May 30, 2005). June 30, 2006: Dynamics of Information Access on the Web (abstract), by the same authors, published in the journal <!--%kramer-post%--> ): Fifteen Minutes of Fame: The Dynamics of Information Access on the Web, by Z. Dezso, E. Almaas, A. Lukács, B. Rácz, I. Szakadát, and A.-L. Barabási, published in arXiv:physics/0505087 June 6, 2005: Martin Stabe writes that Der Spiegel wrote (in German) about this study (their article is dated May 30, 2005). June 30, 2006: Dynamics of Information Access on the Web (abstract), by the same authors, published in the journal

]]> http://www.martinstabe.com/2005/06/06/on-the-web-news-is-old-in-36-hours/comment-page-1/#comment-16460 cybersoc.com Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://martinstabe.com/blog2/?p=792#comment-16460 <!--%kramer-pre%--> A helpful email I just received from Martin Stabe at the Press Gazette points out that the "new" research I blogged about in the previous post was actually itself more than 36 hours old. Martin, by the way, blogged along the same lines as I did but manages to do so a bit more eloquently, and with links to the original research .pdf and a watered down (eg. remotely understandable) version.<!--%kramer-post%--> A helpful email I just received from Martin Stabe at the Press Gazette points out that the “new” research I blogged about in the previous post was actually itself more than 36 hours old. Martin, by the way, blogged along the same lines as I did but manages to do so a bit more eloquently, and with links to the original research .pdf and a watered down (eg. remotely understandable) version.

]]>